An unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test from Vandenberg Air Force Base
An unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile launches during a test from Vandenberg Air Force Base

Pentagon Says China and Russia Nearing Status as US Nuclear Peers

The commander of U.S. Strategic Command said that or the first time, the United States will face two peer competitors with nuclear capabilities — China and Russia — by the end of this decade. Speaking at the Nuclear Deterrence Forum sponsored by the Air Force Association’s Mitchell Institute, Navy Adm. Charles A. Richard discussed the rapid modernization and readiness improvements by Russia and China in both their strategic and conventional military capabilities — and the challenges those improvements pose for the United States. China is in the process of completely building out its own nuclear triad, with the strategic bomber being the last part to be put into place, he said. The other two legs of the triad — intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarines — are already operational.

Sailors aboard the fast-attack submarine USS Columbia prepare to moor at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, following a six-month deployment in the Western Pacific, June 6, 2020.
Sailors aboard the fast-attack submarine USS Columbia prepare to moor at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, following a six-month deployment in the Western Pacific, June 6, 2020. (Photo By: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael H. Lee)

In addition, the admiral said, China is expanding all of its other capabilities, including new command and control systems and new warning systems, as well as conventional readiness and modernization improvements. In its rapid expansion of across-the-board military capabilities, Richard said, China always goes faster than the United States. He noted that in 2013, the Chinese didn’t have a coast guard. Today, he said, it has 255 cutters, adding that the coast guard is a perfect instrument to use below the threshold of armed conflict.Likewise, Richard said, Russia has been modernizing everything over the last 15 years, and that process is about 70% complete. That includes command and control, warning systems, doctrine, as well as improved readiness and competence in conducting exercises, he said.

Advertisement

A B-1B Lancer from the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., disengages after receiving fuel from a KC-135 Stratotanker from the 100th Air Refueling Wing at Royal Air Force Mildenhall, England, during a training mission over England for Bomber Task Force Europe, May 11, 2020.
A B-1B Lancer from the 28th Bomb Wing at Ellsworth Air Force Base, S.D., disengages after receiving fuel from a KC-135 Stratotanker from the 100th Air Refueling Wing at Royal Air Force Mildenhall, England, during a training mission over England for Bomber Task Force Europe, May 11, 2020. (Photo By: Air Force Staff Sgt. Kelly O’Connor)

The United States and the Department of Defense have not had to consider the full implications of competition through possible crisis and possible armed conflict with a nuclear-capable peer adversary in close to 30 years. The implications are profound. The department has good leadership and a good strategy for addressing the situation, in the National Defense Strategy, Richard said. The NDS states that, in conflict, all domains — sea, air, land, space and cyber — will be challenged, he said, adding that it warns that strategic deterrence, which has always been foundational to the rest of the defense strategy, “will be tested in ways that haven’t been tested before.” The admiral said that despite the COVID-19 pandemic, Stratcom “did not miss a beat.”

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.